|
Going Once, Going Twice...
I really hope you aren't still complaining about the gyrations AS2 causes.
While it has been the law of the Sarbanes Oxley landscape for the last several years, the last two months have given all SOX professionals and managers at publicly traded companies alike the opportunity to review and weigh in on a more effective way to live with this much needed discipline.
With the comment period closed, the considerable task of pondering everyone's feedback falls to the SEC and PCAOB. It is interesting to review some of the feedback provided (i.e. FEI comments), and consider the many aspects of this regulation that must be weighed and balanced.
We've seen considerable changes in the last year, targeting refinement for small business - just in time, as it were. As I personally work with small business clients, I'm struck by the tremendous amount of work that needs to be done in an "offensive" sense, in as much that SOX compliance is about preparing the landscape from a "defensive" perspective. So much of the traditional SOX implementation requires focus on "ensuring that things are done right" that businesses still aren't necessarily reviewing their process to ensure that they are "doing the right thing."
I have found the proposed guidance from SEC and PCAOB (AS5) to increase the value of tools that let management guide their business. Looking back on the COSO framework (and COSO SB guidance), the intent is to begin with management Objectives, and then managed risks from this perspective. The objective perspective puts the relative risks of different processes in a very different light than the bottoms-up scrutiny that gets enforced and regularly monitored on AP Clerks desks.
I am particularly heartened by the following attributes that I think will make SOX work more valuable to the company:
- Increased emphasis on Entity Level Controls. I hope to see more companies pulling their human capital management practices (both HR and employee development and training) more fully into the fold. So many deficiencies arise from people that have had inadequate training to perform the tasks they now own.
- Acknowledgement of the Detective Strength of Management Reporting. If you've ever worked closely with a sales division, you understand how closely operational managers can dissect a financial statement. When operational managers are held accountable for variances to budget, we see the merger of COSO's operational and financial aspects being reconciled by persons that truly understand the business.
- Risk Adjusted Control Monitoring (increased reliance on Self Assessment). Acknowledging the controls in all company processes has merit, but testing them all is ludicrous. The opportunity for rotation testing serves auditors and management alike with reduced cost in lower-risk areas. For companies not yet using a self assessment process, prepare to be amazed at how rapidly control owners edit their language and step up their ownership. There is nothing so powerful as creating visibility from the executive ranks to the front lines to ensure that appropriate business practices are being executed.
Help Wanted: A Call for Peer Network
As a consultant interested in participating in challenging projects while working with great people, it seems that, as independents, we have the contacts or the opportunities, but not always the right network of professionals with the necessary availability to deliver the specific details of a project. I want to make an effort to remedy this challenge.
I am keen on making contacts with independents that are interested in developing an informal relationship with other specialists in this space to share work in challenging projects. Given the wealth of areas for specialization in the risk and control field, I am interested in cultivating relationships with professionals interested in project work, or looking for assistance in efforts that have lined up.
I would love to hear from folks interested in expanding their network of professionals for possible project work in the future.
For those that have been reading Inside Sarbanes Oxley since it launched in the fall of 2004, I hope we've done a good job of keeping you informed of emerging issues and developments around the regulatory impact of Sarbanes Oxley. You will recognize that we've not done much in the way of connecting with readers and practitioners within this community, because so many professionals have been buried beneath the chore of just getting projects across the finish line. I now want to reach out, making connections with people that are still grooving on this work after a few implementations.
As Publisher of Inside Sarbanes Oxley and a risk and controls consultant, I continue to thrive on this work. I love the opportunities that come with a new engagement and control environment implementation, and seeing the dramatic changes that occur within an organization in a period as short as a few months. I also appreciate the new opportunities for learning that come from working with new people, and drawing new insights from their experiences.
As the breadth of the on-going compliance requirements continue to be hashed out, it occurs to me that full implementations (risk assessment through year 1 testing) will continue to shrink. Obviously there a few opportunities that remain, but the vast majority of work seems to already be shifting toward outsourced testing resources and internal control environment managers (solo artists asked to oversee the health over testing results and manage change into the documentation developed to-date).
I recognize that not everyone shares the risk tolerance of the independent consultant. I also recognize that not everyone is interested in engagements across the country or around the globe. That said, I welcome the opportunity to begin conversations that could lead to collaborative opportunities for the many of you running small (or individual) consultancies.
If gaining visibility to such a community would be of interest to you, please drop me a note at toby.lucich@insidesarbanesoxley.com, or connect to me at LinkedIn (http://www.linkedin.com/in/tobylucich). Note that connections via LinkedIn are public, so contact me at toby.lucich@insidesarbanesoxley.com for a more discrete point of contact.
I would welcome discussion about what you love to deliver to a client, the type of challenge you would love to land next, and upcoming availability or opportunities. I look forward to discussions of areas of expertise (i.e. projects managed, cycles documented, processes redesigned, industry experience) as well as your level of interest in future projects (regionally within the US or on a global basis).Labels: consulting, implementation, independent, network, sarbanes oxley, sarbox, sox
|
|
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
February 2006
May 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
February 2007
March 2007
Sarbanes Oxley
books
Sarbanes Oxley news blog
Sarbanes Oxley discussion
|