|
Wednesday, April 09, 2008 But restatements associated with fraud and revenue declined after 2001, said the report authored by Susan Scholz, a University of Kansas professor of accounting. Restatements jumped to 1,577 in 2006 from 90 in 1997, although much of the increase came from small companies that are not traded on major stock exchanges, the report said. Scholz found fraud was a factor in 29 percent of all 1997 restatements, but only in 2 percent of 2006 restatements. US company restatements soared 1997 to 2006--study Labels: fraud, restatement studies, sox, Susan Scholz, US Treasury
Thursday, April 19, 2007 When the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act was passed by Congress and signed into law in 2002, its goal was to protect investors through increased disclosure and stiffened internal controls. The law was passed following accounting frauds at Enron, WorldCom and other U.S. companies. But on April 4, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced it will revisit some of SOX's rules. The primary focus will be the heavy financial costs of Section 404, which requires auditors of most publicly listed companies to verify the effectiveness of the company's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. Will the SEC Embrace a Softer Sarbanes-Oxley?
|
Sponsored by:
Kumquat: Get the feedback you deserve
Learn more
FREE to Inside Sarbanes Oxley readers

Proposed "Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of ...
Survey: Enterprise risk management still a blind s...
Large-caps set high corporate governance standards...
Lawsuits may expand Sarbanes-Oxley
Harsh internal IMF audit calls for 'major changes'...
Board Adopts New Ethics and Independence Rule Conc...
SOX Life Blog: Knowledge Management and Corporate ...