|
Saturday, May 19, 2007 But worst of all, they are at risk for creating justifications for less-than-professional performance. I'm not thinking about just fraud (though this attitude is very much at the heart of embezzlement and other acts of personal gain at the expense of the company), but about the impact to professional levels of service delivery. When feeling overwhelmed, "what is best or important" gets put aside for addressing "what is urgent." Just looking to one's own personal life provides a rich series of examples where important is sacraficed for urgent - poor eating habits, less/no exercise, lack of sleep - all given up for things that feel urgent at the time, but have limited long-term value. We sometimes get sloppy and lose our focus. Not malicious, just a simple error. Explaining Segregation of Duties Labels: segregation of duties Previous articles Fraud too pervasive to roll back SarbOx
|
Sponsored by:
Kumquat: Get the feedback you deserve
Learn more
FREE to Inside Sarbanes Oxley readers

|
About inside Sarbanes-Oxley inside Sarbanes Oxley is dedicated to finding the best sources of news and information on the changing landscape of Sarbanes Oxley and compliance. Whether you call it SOX, Sarbox, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, look no further than inside Sarbanes Oxley. More Copyright © 2004-2006, Inside Sarbanes-Oxley
|
Additional resources Try these recently updated resources: RSS Feed Interested in staying up-to-date on all the latest Sarbanes-Oxley news? Subscribe to the inside Sarbanes-Oxley RSS feed and get all of the latest news on SOX delivered directly to your feed reader. inside
Sarbanes-Oxley RSS Feed
|