|
Monday, April 16, 2007 But is Sarbox all bad? The US has sustained a barrage of criticism for introducing a law, whose Section 404 provision on internal and auditor checks was seen as one of the most intrusive, and costly, measures ever foisted on corporate executives. Sarbox changes welcomed but imitators aboundLabels: Austrailia, Brazil, Canada, EU, France, Hong Kong, internal control, Mexico, sec 404 sox Previous articles SOX and J-SOX Primer
|
Sponsored by:
Kumquat: Get the feedback you deserve
Learn more
FREE to Inside Sarbanes Oxley readers

|
About inside Sarbanes-Oxley inside Sarbanes Oxley is dedicated to finding the best sources of news and information on the changing landscape of Sarbanes Oxley and compliance. Whether you call it SOX, Sarbox, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, look no further than inside Sarbanes Oxley. More Copyright © 2004-2006, Inside Sarbanes-Oxley
|
Additional resources Try these recently updated resources: RSS Feed Interested in staying up-to-date on all the latest Sarbanes-Oxley news? Subscribe to the inside Sarbanes-Oxley RSS feed and get all of the latest news on SOX delivered directly to your feed reader. inside
Sarbanes-Oxley RSS Feed
|