Thursday, June 22, 2006 This approach would offer some relief to smaller public companies that were disappointed by last week's Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decision to reject a proposal to exempt them from complying with the audit rules of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002. John Hagerty, vice president of Boston-based AMR Research, said many companies initially took the costly approach of testing and documenting internal controls for everything to protect themselves from violating Sarbanes-Oxley. Sarbanes-Oxley testing cuts could mean cost cuts Previous articles Sarb-Ox critics have short-term memories
|
Sponsored by:
Kumquat: Get the feedback you deserve
Learn more
FREE to Inside Sarbanes Oxley readers
|
About inside Sarbanes-Oxley inside Sarbanes Oxley is dedicated to finding the best sources of news and information on the changing landscape of Sarbanes Oxley and compliance. Whether you call it SOX, Sarbox, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, look no further than inside Sarbanes Oxley. More Copyright © 2004-2006, Inside Sarbanes-Oxley
|
Additional resources Try these recently updated resources: RSS Feed Interested in staying up-to-date on all the latest Sarbanes-Oxley news? Subscribe to the inside Sarbanes-Oxley RSS feed and get all of the latest news on SOX delivered directly to your feed reader. inside
Sarbanes-Oxley RSS Feed
|
