|
Monday, November 29, 2004 Yet there is a curious aspect to this backlash. For as Lynn Turner, former chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission, points out, Section 404 does not mandate a single new control beyond those already mandated by Congress in 1977 in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Nor is there anything that goes beyond the Treadway Commission's recommendations in 1992 on internal control, which have long been regarded in the US as best practice. Part of the problem is that the enforcement climate is tougher. Auditors, with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board at their back and the demise of Andersen playing on their nerves, have also become hyperactive on the internal control issue. No escape from the escalating cost of Sox Previous articles Disgruntled CFOs are calling it quits
|
Sponsored by:
Kumquat: Get the feedback you deserve
Learn more
FREE to Inside Sarbanes Oxley readers

|
About inside Sarbanes-Oxley inside Sarbanes Oxley is dedicated to finding the best sources of news and information on the changing landscape of Sarbanes Oxley and compliance. Whether you call it SOX, Sarbox, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, look no further than inside Sarbanes Oxley. More Copyright © 2004-2006, Inside Sarbanes-Oxley
|
Additional resources Try these recently updated resources: RSS Feed Interested in staying up-to-date on all the latest Sarbanes-Oxley news? Subscribe to the inside Sarbanes-Oxley RSS feed and get all of the latest news on SOX delivered directly to your feed reader. inside
Sarbanes-Oxley RSS Feed
|